I have yet to hear a single argument besides 'ad hominem' empty attacks that can't easily be debunked from any anti-911 truth folks. And not one hard question has been answered. I know from what I speak, years ago i was skeptical until I did the hard reading and research to try to answer some questions and challenge my own thought. Here's one: how can the authorities both claim that the pentagon flight 'disintegrated' on impact, but yet they have fingerprints identifying the on-board victims? Or, how about the miraculous finding of a hijacker passport amid the apocalyptic rubble of ground zero? Or, how did wtc7 demolish in the exact manner of a controlled demolition if even jet fuel theories don't apply, since a jet didn't hit it? Another simple question: do the 'collapses' (not really collapses but pulverizations, but let's use your wording) look at all at least similar to controlled demolition? Do they bear all the features of controlled demolition?
St josephs catholic high school
There were and are unanswered questions about the terrorist attack, and serious inconsistencies, even demonstrable errors, in the official bedroom version of events (which is to say, the one contained in the 9/11 Commission report). Some of the challenges to the official account may have depended on fuzzy thinking or facts, or were subsequently refuted, but the defenders of the orthodox version of events constantly conflated the silly claims along with those that had substance. So that to question the official account in any respect made one a "conspiracy theorist who would be immediately tarred like a believer in ufos or something. Well 9/11, even by the official account, was a conspiracy (maybe critics need to look up the word "conspiracy and there are still unanswered rational and relevant questions about the official account of that conspiracy, and its consequences. There are perfectly legitimate bases for suspicion about the bush government, since it so quickly and thoroughly exploited the 9/11 attacks to advance bush's policy intentions versus Iraq, and because the 9/11 attack itself so perfectly fit the stated need of the neocon/pnac agenda for. These suspicions, movies whether they are right or wrong, will remain unresolved, because we can't have a serious discussion of them, based on the facts we can actually establish, without the defenders of orthodoxy immediately resorting to ridicule and evasion. I'd still like to know what really happened on 9/11, and why. The official account still fails to account for too many established facts, not to mention reported observations from presumptively reliable sources that, while they haven't been definitively verified, appear to have substance, and call for examination and explanation. Alas, these are questions one is apparently discouraged from asking; in any case, they will not be answered. Posted by: Iconoblaster september 8, 2009 1:51 pm posted by: lehill september 8, 2009 12:52 pm posted by: ani1 september 8, 2009 12:50 pm posted by: scrivener50 september 8, 2009 11:42 am posted by: Common_Cents1 september 8, 2009 9:40 am posted by: wonderwaleye september.
If they were 'shoot the plane that didn't happen, so either the orders were disobeyed, (unlikely) or those weren't the the in that case the order would have been a stand down. In an interesting twist, the zaccharias moussaoui trial debunked the idea that Barbara Olson called her husband on a cell phone from Flight. American Airlines also said they didn't have airphones in 2001 on their planes. Here's a link to an article about qualcomm saying in 2004 that 'cell phone calls will finally be possible from planes ml "Let's roll" becomes state propaganda when you look at it, and it worked-to a large degree, the country is largely still asleep re:911. These and hundreds of other questions need answers. Hence, my being a 'nutjob' truther. posted by: akjmicro september 8, 2009 10:55 pm posted by: BrianValentine september 8, 2009 7:05 pm posted by: wonderwaleye september 8, 2009 3:41 pm posted by: BrianValentine september 8, 2009 2:52 pm i guess I'm not really surprised that it has come to the point.
By all means, pentagon authorities, clear up the question once and for all, release the footage that unambiguosly shows Flight 77 hitting the pentagon! Why don't they release anything? Why do they confiscate and obfuscate? Is that equivalent to 'cover-up'? No, i don't think Cheney could be interpreted as being in hesitation to shoot down a civilian dessay plane. Don't forget, the wtc towers had already been hit. Why would he hesitate with that knowledge? It would have been triple red alert, and I think they would have taken no chances. And what were the 'orders' that Mineta witnessed?
Add 44 to your Site, be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail. Get This Widget posted by: Annon5 september 10, 2009 1:50 am posted by: Annon5 september 10, 2009 1:31 am posted by: wonderwaleye september 9, 2009 2:22 pm hi akzen, your question is a fair e simple truth is: "I don't know what exactly hit the. There are plenty of rather perverse inconsistencies in the offical account. The flight path reported by the 911 Commission doesn't agree with any known eyewitness accounts, not in a subtle way, but in major ways. There are witnesses who are even aviation experts who call the offical account utter bulls* t! Do you know, someone in the pentagon must know. And with all the cameras surrounding that building, why no released footage.
Here's The powerful Letter The Stanford Victim read to her
"I don't think he's sports the issue alexander said. "I think the czars are the issue.". Former Vermont governor Howard dean writing rallied to jones' defense, saying he had signed the controversial 9-11 "Truther" petition by mistake. "I think he was brought down. It's too bad dean said. "I think it's a loss for the country.".
Staff writers Anne. Kornblut and Juliet Eilperin contributed to this report. Posted at 12:30 am. Sep 6, 2009, category: Cast of Characters, share This: Technorati. Tag in, digg This, previous: Obama Offers Steps to make retirement savings Easier. Next: Today on the sunday talk Shows.
His one-time involvement with the bay area radical group Standing Together to Organize a revolutionary movement (storm which had Marxist roots, had also become an issue. And on Saturday his advocacy on behalf of death-row inmate mumia abu-jamal, who was convicted of shooting a philadelphia police officer in 1981, threatened to develop into a fresh point of controversy. Fox News Channel host Glenn Beck launched the drive against Jones and all but declared war on him after a group Jones founded in 2005, colorofChange. Org, led an advertising boycott against Beck's show to protest his claim that Obama is a racist. Mike pence (R-Ind.) called on Jones to resign Friday, saying in a statement, "His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate.". Bond (r-mo.) urged Congress to investigate jones's "fitness" for the position, writing in an open letter, "Can the American people trust a senior White house official that is so cavalier in his association with such radical and repugnant sentiments?" On Saturday, sen.
John Cornyn (r-texas chairman of the national Republican Senatorial Committee, wrote on his Twitter account, "Van Jones has.". Jones's resignation was foreshadowed Friday when Gibbs gave only tepid support for him when pressed, saying that Jones "continues to work for the administration." he declined to state that the adviser enjoyed the full support of President Obama, instead referring questions to the environmental council. Jones, a towering figure in the environmental movement, had worked for the White house council on Environmental quality since march. He was a civil-rights activist in California before turning his focus to environmental and energy issues, and he won wide praise before joining the Obama administration for articulating a broad vision of a green economy democrats could embrace. White house adviser david Axelrod, on nbc's "Meet the Press said Sunday he had not spoken with the president about Jones. "The political environment is rough, and so these things get magnified. But the bottom line is that he showed his commitment to the cause of creating green jobs in this country by removing himself as an issue, and I think that took a great deal of commitment on his part he said. On fox news Sunday, sen. Lamar Alexander (r-tenn.) and former house Speaker Newt Gingrich declined to criticize jones directly, though Alexander did question why the Obama administration had appointed so many issue czars.
Literary terms and Definitions: d - carson-Newman College
"On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me jones said. "They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide.". He continued: "I have been inundated with calls - from across the political spectrum - urging me to 'stay and fight.' but I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future.". Jones, who joined the administration in March as special adviser for green jobs at the ceq, had issued two public apologies in recent days, one for signing a petition in 2004 from the group 911Truth. Org that questioned whether Bush administration officials "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war" and the other for using a crude term to describe republicans in a speech he gave before joining drinking the administration.
White house spokesman Robert Gibbs on Sunday explained the resignation on abc's "This week with george Stephanopoulos saying, "Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual." The president does not endorse jones's past statements and actions, "but. A white house official, story who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter, said Jones's past was not studied as intensively as other advisers because of his relatively low rank. Jones's position did not require senate confirmation, so he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected. In addition, as an adviser to the council on Environmental quality, rather than to Obama directly, his past was not reviewed to the same degree as the more senior "assistants to the president" and other top advisers inside the west Wing. The result was the revelation of a controversial past that, administration officials acknowledge, caught the White house off guard. "He was not as thoroughly vetted as other administration officials the official said. "It's fair to say there were unknowns.". The announcement that Jones was stepping down came minutes after midnight Sunday morning.
clicking continue below and using our sites or applications, you agree that we and our third party advertisers can: transfer your personal data to the United States or other countries, and process your personal data to serve you with personalized ads, subject to your. Eu data subject Requests. By a unanimous vote, the house permanent Select Committee on Intelligence today reported the matthew young Pollard Intelligence authorization Act for Fiscal years 20 (H.R. 6237) to the full house of Representatives. This legislation provides the Intelligence community (IC) the necessary. Cast of Characters, van Jones, pictured at the national Clean Energy summit.0 on August 10 in Las Vegas. 9/6/09, by Scott Wilson and Garance Franke-ruta. White house environmental adviser, van Jones resigned late saturday after a simmering controversy over his past statements and activism erupted into calls for his ouster from Republican leaders on Friday.
Wenn du dein Konto löschst oder wir es deaktivieren, enden diese nutzungsbedingungen zwar als Vereinbarung zwischen dir und uns, aber folgende bestimmungen bleiben weiterhin bestehen: 3,.2 -.5. To bring you the best content on our sites and applications, meredith partners with third party advertisers to serve digital ads, including personalized digital ads. Those advertisers use tracking technologies to collect information about your activity on our sites and applications and across the Internet and your other apps and devices. You time always have the choice to experience our sites without personalized advertising based on your web browsing activity by visiting the. Daas Consumer Choice page, the, nAI's website, and/or the, eu online choices page, from each of your browsers or devices. To avoid personalized advertising based on your mobile app activity, you can install the. Daas AppChoices app here.
In the Frame: my life in Words and Pictures: Helen Mirren
Aussetzung oder Kündigung von Konten. Wir möchten, dass Facebook ein Ort ist, an dem Menschen sich willkommen und sicher dabei fühlen, sich auszudrücken und ihre gedanken und Ideen zu teilen. Unser Recht auf Kündigung aus wichtigem Grund bleibt hiervon unberührt. Ein wichtiger Grund liegt insbesondere vor, wenn eine partei gegen sich aus diesen Nutzungsbedingungen ergebende Pflichten, gesetze, rechte Dritter oder Datenrichtlinien verstößt, und der kündigenden Partei unter Berücksichtigung sämtlicher Umstände des Einzelfalls und nach Abwägung der Interessen beider Parteien die fortsetzung des Vertragsverhältnisses bis zum. Eine kündigung aus wichtigem Grund ist nur innerhalb eines angemessenen zeitrahmens nach Kenntniserlangung von dem Verstoß möglich. Ist der wichtige Grund ein Verstoß gegen eine Pflicht dieser Nutzungsbedingungen, so ist die kündigung nur nach dem erfolglosen Ablauf einer gewährten Abhilfefrist oder nach einer erfolglosen Abmahnung zulässig. Eine Frist für die abhilfe ist jedoch nicht erforderlich, wenn die andere seite die erfüllung ihrer Pflichten ernsthaft und endgültig verweigert oder wenn nach Abwägung der Interessen beider Parteien besondere Umstände eine sofortige kündigung rechtfertigen. Du kannst mehr dazu erfahren, was du tun kannst, wenn dein Konto deaktiviert worden ist, und wie du uns kontaktieren kannst, wenn wir nach deiner meinung dein Konto irrtümlicherweise deaktiviert haben.filsafat